Dynamic cost-optimized true zero recovery time objective for multiple applications

ABSTRACT

Data protection operations including replication operations that dynamically adapt a topology of replica virtual machines. A data protection system may implement a machine model that is trained using, as input, characteristics of virtual machines. When a failure is predicted, a topology of the replica virtual machines is changed. The topology may also change when changes in the environment are detected. The changes may include redistributing the protected applications to the replica virtual machines and/or scaling the replica virtual machines.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention generally relate to data protection and data protection operations. More particularly, at least some embodiments of the invention relate to systems, hardware, software, computer-readable media, and methods for protecting data including data replication for multiple applications.

BACKGROUND

Data protection systems can protect data in a variety of different manners. The process of protecting data generally provides the ability to backup and recover data. However, there are a variety of data protection operations and many ways to backup/recover data.

One of the concerns related to backing up data, in addition to having a valid backup, is the ability to restore the data. Recovering applications or failing over applications allows the applications to resume operation. However, the longer it takes to perform a recovery operation or a failover operation, the greater the damage to an entity.

One of the metrics used to characterize the restore operation is Recovery Time Objective (RTO). The RTO indicates a point in time at which operation may resume or the point in time at which the recovery operation is completed. Data protection operations often seek to find ways to reduce the RTO.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In order to describe the manner in which at least some of the advantages and features of the invention may be obtained, a more particular description of embodiments of the invention will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, embodiments of the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a data protection system configured to replicate a production virtual machine to a replica virtual machine;

FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a data protection system where multiple production applications associated with one or more virtual machines and their virtual disks are replicated to the same replica virtual machine;

FIG. 3 illustrates an example of a method for replicating applications using a replication strategy;

FIG. 4 illustrates and example of a data protection system that replicates production applications to replica virtual machines using a replication strategy that uses metrics;

FIG. 5 illustrates an example of a method for replicating applications using a metric based replication strategy;

FIG. 6 illustrates an example of a data protection system configured to replicate applications using a failure domain based replication strategy;

FIG. 7 illustrates an example of a method for replicating applications using a failure domain based replication strategy;

FIG. 8 illustrates an example of a data protection system configured to replicate applications using a related application based replication strategy;

FIG. 9 illustrates an example of a method for replicating applications using a related application based strategy replication strategy;

FIG. 10 illustrates an example of a replication engine configured to perform dynamic replication strategies;

FIG. 11 illustrates an example of a dynamic replication strategy in a system protected by a data protection system;

FIG. 12 illustrates an example of moving a portable application; and

FIG. 13 illustrates an example of a method for replicating data in accordance with a replication strategy that uses a machine model and that may also implement other replication strategies separately or at the same time.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SOME EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

Embodiments of the present invention generally relate to data protection operations including data backup and restore operations. More particularly, at least some embodiments of the invention relate to systems, hardware, software, computer-readable media, and methods for data protection and to performing data protection operations. Examples of data protection operations include, but are not limited to, backup operations, replication operations, any point in time (PiT) recovery operations, journaling operations, restore or recovery operations, disaster recovery operations, failover operations, failback operations, or the like or combination thereof. Embodiments of the invention may be implemented in a variety of different networks and configurations including physical and/or virtual systems, virtual machines (VMs), local area networks, wide area networks, cellular networks, cloud-based systems and networks including datacenters, or the like or combination thereof.

In general, example embodiments of the invention relate to systems and methods for protecting data in a manner that improves Recovery Time Objective (RTO) while also managing cost. A PiT data protection system may replicate IO (Input/Output) from a production site that is associated with or includes multiple virtual machines to a replica site that may include multiple replica virtual machines. In the PiT data protection system, when operating, the replica virtual machine disks are updated with new data that has been written to the production virtual machine disks. Access to the replica virtual machine disks is typically blocked by a software component such as a splitter to avoid inconsistencies and unwanted data changes.

In one example, the replica virtual machine may be powered off or in a “shadow” mode. In shadow mode, the virtual machine disks or volumes exist and can be written to, but the operating system (OS) is not running. Recovering from the replica virtual machine or failing over to the replica virtual machine will require powering on the virtual machine and booting the OS. This is a process that may take significant time. Even though a data protection system may protect the whole virtual machine, it is often advantageous to protect a production application, which typically runs on the production virtual machine.

When operating in shadow mode, the RTO may include both the start up time of the virtual machine, the boot time of the OS and the start time of the application. Embodiments of the invention reduce the RTO and the associated costs.

FIG. 1 illustrates an example of reducing the RTO for a single protected virtual machine. FIG. 1 illustrates a production virtual machine 102 that is replicated to a replica virtual machine 112. The virtual machines 102 may be on-premise, cloud-based, or the like. The virtual machine includes an OS 120 and is running applications (apps) 122 and 124. FIG. 1 illustrates VMDKs, which are examples of virtual disks or volumes. A VMDK is an example of a virtual machine disk and is a file format that describes a container or format for virtual hard drives used with virtual machines. Embodiments of the invention are not limited to any particular format.

In FIG. 1, the OS 120 is associated with a virtual disk (VMDK) 102, the app 122 is associated with a virtual disk 106, and the app 124 is associated with a virtual disk 108. However, the apps 122 and 124 may also run on the OS disk or volume and the data of the apps 122 and 124 may be on, respectively, virtual disks 106 and 108. Thus, the apps 122 and 124 may be installed on the OS virtual disk 104.

The replica virtual machine 112 is associated with virtual disks 114, 116, and 118. During replication, the production data written to the virtual disks 106 and 108 may be journaled in a journal 110 and written to, respectively, virtual disks 116 and 118. Thus, the applications 122 and 124 are effectively replicated to the replica virtual machine 112. Binaries of the applications 122 and 124 may be stored or installed on the virtual disk 114, which is also an OS disk for the replica virtual machine 112. The applications 122 and 124 could also be stored on the data virtual volumes or disks 116 and 118.

To improve the RTO, FIG. 1 illustrates that the data associated with the apps 122 and 124 are replicated to different virtual disks on the replica virtual machine 112. The RTO of a protected application can be reduced by separating the protected applications' data to different virtual disks or volumes. Further, the OS on the replica virtual machine 112 may already be running and ready to recover on demand. Further, embodiments of the invention may select a trigger to rescan the disks from the OS and application perspectives. When an OS mounts a filesystem or attaches to a disk the OS sends a set of commands to identify and inquire information about the newly added device. This include figuring out the device size, type, layout/format, different identifiers, modes of operation etc. Filesystems usually have this information as part of their first few blocks while block devices have commands to figure this out (SCSI inquiry command for example). On Linux systems this is triggered on mount commands or managed by fstab, and on Windows by the Windows Volume Manager. This information gathering is many times referred to as a rescan.

The RTO, in this example, allows an RTO of seconds to be achieved instead of minutes by removing the need to configure hardware, POST, boot the OS, perform network discovery and connection, login or the like.

In one example, virtual machines that only have a single disk can often be configured to have a supported configuration or configured with a different configuration. This may include adding at least one more virtual disk, formatting the added disk with a file system and setting the application data source to reside on the added disk. The examples discussed herein may include a single OS disk, but embodiments of the invention are not limited to a single OS disk. However, the OS and an application typically reside on a predefined fixed number of disks. These and/or the data disks can be tagged for identification purposes. Further, references to virtual disks may also include references to virtual volumes.

The data protection system of FIG. 1 may reduce the RTO for a single protected virtual machine. Protecting multiple virtual machines where the OS is running, and the applications are installed requires multiple replica virtual machines running on a tier-1 disaster recovery datacenter. To achieve minimal RTO, the virtual machines are powered up and the OS is running. This may include memory and processor reservations. In effect, the replica virtual machine is or is close to being a fully operational virtual machine. As previously stated, this has an associated cost. Running operational or nearly operational virtual machines in the cloud when performing data protection operations such as replication may have a high cost.

Embodiments of the invention optimize or reduce this cost by sharing replica virtual machines with several applications. In other words, multiple applications may be replicated to the same replica virtual machine. Embodiments of the invention create a relationship between availability (e.g., in the context of a recovery operation or the like) and cost that can be balanced. Embodiments of the invention relate to static and/or dynamic strategies for optimizing the manner in which virtual machines are shared and the manner in which applications are protected. Balancing the relationship between cost and availability can impact performance when a disaster or other problem occurs. FIG. 1 illustrates an initial example of a data protection operation such as replication for reducing RTO.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example of sharing a replica virtual machine with multiple applications. These applications shared at the replica virtual machine can be run on separate virtual machines at the production site or shared at the production site (e.g., production virtual machines at a production datacenter, or the like). FIG. 2 thus illustrates an example of sharing a replica virtual machine in order to protect multiple applications/virtual machines.

Replicating a virtual machine or replicating an application often have the same effect. The actual data replicated may depend on implementation. However, replicating a virtual machine or replicating an application typically conveys replicating the data associated with the application. The OS and application binary may already be present on the replica virtual machines at the replica site and do not necessarily need to be replicated.

FIG. 2 illustrates a production site 200 that includes production virtual machines 202, 208, and 214. In this example, the virtual machine 202 is associated with OS virtual disk 204 that includes the OS and app1. The virtual machine 208 includes a virtual disk 210 that includes an OS and app2. The virtual machine 214 includes a virtual disk 216 that includes an OS and app3. The data for app1, app2, and app3 are stored, respectively, on virtual disks 206, 212, and 218.

A data protection system 240 may be configured to replicate virtual disks 206, 212, and 218 (or the changes made to these virtual disks once a baseline is established) to replica virtual disks 226, 228, and 230. The virtual disk 224 may include an OS and binaries of app1, app2, and app3. Further, the OS on the virtual disk 224 may or may not be the same as the OSes on the virtual disks 204, 210, and 216. As long as a similar OS is sufficient for app1, app2, and app3, various sharing strategies can be implemented. If the OS version or type is a hard dependency, this may impact the manner in which a replica virtual machine is used for replication. More specifically, the OS system may impact which of the apps and production virtual machines can share the same replica virtual machine when the OS is a hard dependency.

More generally, a typical cloud or datacenter may have large numbers of applications running on separate virtual machines. As a result, the replica virtual machines can share the applications of a production site in a large number of combinations. Some replica virtual machines, for example, may contain M applications while other replica virtual machines may contain fewer or more applications. In some instances, embodiments of the invention ensure that a replica virtual machine only has a single application replicated thereto.

FIG. 3 illustrates an example of a method for sharing a replica virtual machine with multiple applications. In this example, a replica virtual machine may be deployed and installed 302 in a computing environment such as a cloud or datacenter. When the virtual machine is deployed, the OS virtual disk should be large enough to contain M app binaries or a variable number of binaries. The data protection system may place a limit on the number of applications that the replica virtual machine may store or share. In addition to storing M app binaries, the OS should also have the storage to store logs and the like. The OS virtual disk should also have storage for later use if necessary.

Next or if the virtual machines at the replica site have been previously installed/deployed, a strategy is selected 304 for replicating production apps and/or their data to the replica virtual machine. The strategy may include a QoS strategy 306, a failure domain aware strategy 308, or a related application or inter-dependent strategy 310. In some examples, more than one strategy may be used to replicate the production virtual machines. These strategies are discussed later.

A replication engine of a data protection system (e.g., RP4VMs) may replicate 312 production data virtual disks or volumes of the M binaries stored on the replica virtual machine to corresponding disks or volumes on the replica virtual machine. As previously selected, the M binaries or apps may be selected according to a strategy. The apps replicated to the replica virtual machine may be in separate consistency groups by way of example only. As a result, each app may be associated with a separate any-PiT journal and may be recovered independently of other apps.

In some examples, the application and its data may be stored on the same virtual disk. If the applications are not installed together with their data, the applications 1-M may be installed on the OS disk. In some embodiments, the apps are typically turned off. If supported, the app may be in a running state which allows the replica virtual data disk to be mounted at a later time.

As a result, the M production applications are protected to one replica virtual machine and the M applications share the same replica virtual machine. FIG. 2, for example, illustrates that three applications (app1, app2 and app3) are replicated to one replica virtual machine. Stated differently, these three applications in FIG. 2 share the same replica virtual disk for replication.

When applications share a replica virtual disk, the apps protected to the same replica virtual machine should be able to run together. For example, the apps on the replica virtual machine should use the same or similar OS, on which they can run. In addition, the applications should support the same hardware with which the replica virtual machine (e.g., CPU architecture) is configured. If supported by the application, more than one instance of the application can run on the replica virtual machine. If not supported, multiple instances of the application will not be placed on the same replica virtual machine in one example.

Embodiments of the invention may also consider licenses when replicating production applications. For example, an application license may limit an application to a specific hardware ID of a virtual machine. In this case, the application cannot reside on the same replica virtual machine as another application with the same restriction because there is only one hardware ID for the replica virtual machine. However, there are cases where more than one instance of a hardware ID exists on a replica virtual machine. For example, MAC addresses with multiple network cards and hard disks smart ID with multiple virtual disks may allow multiple apps to be supported.

Embodiments of the invention may also consider networking constraints. A virtual machine may have several network cards (NICs) and more than one IP address per NIC. If an application requires a specific IP address, the address can be attached to the replica virtual machine when the application is run. In addition, applications that serve incoming traffic (e.g., web pages), can bind to different IP and port pairs and can work together. If two applications do not work together (e.g., they must bind a specific port on the first NIC) these applications are not placed on the same replica virtual machine. These constraints are typically considered when replicating production applications to replica virtual machines.

By way of example, a replication strategy may generate a topology. More specifically, the topology suggests which production virtual machines are replicated to which replica virtual machines. The topology may describe the manner in which the replica disks are organized. For example, replica disk 1 is used to replicate app1 including data1, replica disk 2 is used to replicate app2, app3, app4 including data2, data3, and data4, etc.

Replication Strategies—Quality of Service

FIG. 4 illustrates an example of a data protection system that replicates, by way of example only, virtual machines, applications, and/or application data from a production site to a replica site. While FIG. 4 is illustrated in terms of virtual disks, each of these virtual disks is associated with a virtual machine. The production virtual disks 420 may each be associated with a different virtual machine. The replica disk 418 may represent multiple virtual disks that are associated with the same virtual machine.

FIG. 4 further illustrates an example of a strategy for replicating virtual machines, applications, and/or application data. A data protection system 402 may be configured to replicate data from production virtual disks 420 to replica virtual disks 422. In this example, the replication engine 404 is configured to replicate the production virtual disks 420 according to a strategy that is referred to as a quality of service (QoS) or a metric strategy. In one example, the replication engine 404 may include a splitter and other components that are configured to replicate data according to the strategy.

In this example, the production virtual disks 420 include virtual disks 408, 410, 412, and 414. The disk 408 includes an app1 and/or data1. Similarly, the disks 410, 412, and 414 include, respectively, app2/data2, app3/data3, and app4/data4. However, the data and the associated app may be on separate disks. For example, the app may be on the OS disk as previously discussed. In one example, the data is replicated because the binaries of the applications may not need to be replicated and may be stored on the relevant disk.

The QoS strategy, when implemented, causes the replication engine 404 to replicate the disk 408 to the replica disk 416. The replication engine 404 replicates the disks 410, 412, and 414 to the same replica virtual disk 418. Thus, app2, app3, and app4 share the same replica virtual disk 418.

The QoS strategy illustrated in FIG. 4 allows an entity to identify applications based on their importance to the entity. In other words, the applications could be ranked on a variety of factors either by input from an administrator or automatically using factors such as usage, resource consumption or requirements, criticality, or the like. In one example, these factors and other characteristics may be embodied as rules 406. For example, a rule may reflect user input specifying the importance of an application. In this example, app1 is deemed more important than the app2, app3, and app4. The important of an app may be presented as a priority. As a result, the app1 is associated with its own replica virtual disk 416 because it has a higher priority that the other apps and/or because the priority is higher than a threshold priority. The rules 406 may also account for restrictions and constraints (e.g., license, networking, OS) previously discussed.

In other words, to achieve higher performance, at least in terms of recovery, the replica virtual disk 416 is not shared with any other applications and is configured to support a single application. Alternatively, certain replica virtual disks may have a limit on the number of applications that share those replica virtual disks. In one example, the applications may each be associated with a value M. The M value of a first application indicates how many other applications the first application can share a replica virtual machine with. If the app1 has an M value of 1, this rule indicates that the app1 should have a dedicated replica virtual disk, as illustrated in FIG. 4. In this example, app2, app3, and app4 each have an M value of at least 3.

Using a single replica virtual machine for several applications has cost benefits when production virtual machines are operating properly, but has performance consequences when recovery is required. As a result, more important apps are typically replicated to dedicated virtual machines or to virtual machines that are limited in the number of applications replicated thereto.

FIG. 5 illustrates an example of a method for implementing a replication strategy. FIG. 5 further illustrates an example of replicating virtual machines (or applications and/or data thereof) from a production site to a replica site. Initially, the production virtual machines (or the applications running thereon) are assessed 502 based on a strategy such as a Quality of Service strategy or using another metric or combinations of metrics. This metric allows comparatively more important applications to be replicated differently. The metric may be expressed, in one example, using a value. This value may be determined for each of the applications. The value identifies, with respect to an application, how many other applications can be replicated to the same virtual machine. For example, if an application has a value of 1, then that application is replicated to its own or a dedicated replica virtual machine. If an application has a value of 3, then the replica virtual machine to which that application is replicated can also be used to replicate at least two more applications. Thus, that replica virtual machine may be used to replicate three applications (as long as the values of the other applications are also at least 3).

The assessment 502 is able to divide the applications being replicated into subsets. Each subset is replicated to a corresponding replica virtual machine. If a subset includes a single application, then that application is the only application replicated to a particular replica virtual machine. If a subset includes 3 applications, those 3 applications are replicated to the same replica virtual machine.

Once the assessment is completed, the data protection system may be configured 504 to replicate the applications in accordance with the strategy. This may include deploying and installing the replica virtual machines, configuring or reconfiguring existing replica virtual machines, or the like.

Next, the production virtual machines (or their applications and data) are replicated to the replica virtual machines. Often, the application may not need to be replicated. Rather, the binary can simply be stored on the replica virtual disk of the virtual machine along with the OS. Typically, replication involves replicating the IOs that occur with respect to an application's data.

Replication Strategies—Failure Domain Aware Strategy

FIG. 6 illustrates an example of a data protection system configured to replicate data according to a strategy such as a failure domain aware strategy. FIG. 6 illustrates components of a data protection system including a failure domain detector 602 and a replication engine 640. These components are involved in replicating data from production virtual machines 610, 616, and 622 to a replica virtual machine 630.

As illustrated in FIG. 6, the virtual machine 610 is associated with a virtual disk 612 that may include an OS and app1. The virtual disk 614 includes data1 associated with app1. Similarly, the virtual disk 618 includes the OS and app2 and the virtual disk 620 stores data2 associated with app2. The virtual disk 624 stores the OS and app3 and the virtual disk 626 stores data3 associated with the app3.

In this example, the failure domain detector 602 may collect information about the virtual machines 610, 616, and 622. The failure domain detector 602 may collect, byway of example only, virtual machine information 604, datastore information 606, and hypervisor information 608. The collection may be repeated such that the assessment can be reevaluated at times.

By way of example only, the virtual machine information 604 may include IP information for each of the virtual machines. The datastore information 606 may include or identify the physical datastores associated with the virtual machines. The hypervisor information 608 may include or identify the host hypervisors for the virtual machines 610, 616, and 622.

The replication engine 640 may evaluate, assess, or analyze the virtual machine information 604, the datastore information 606, and the hypervisor information 608 to determine how the virtual machines 610, 616, and 622 or the app1, app2 and app3 and associated data1, data2, and data3 should be replicated. The replication engine 640 takes this information into account when generating recommendations on how to perform replication or when replicating.

More specifically, the replication engine 640 may recommend that virtual machines belonging to the same failure domain should be replicated to different replica virtual machines. Alternatively, the replication engine 640 may recommend that virtual machines belonging to different failure domains be replicated to the same replica virtual machine.

FIG. 6 illustrates an example where the virtual machines 610, 616, and 622 belong to different failure domains and can be replicated to the same virtual machine 630. Thus, the replica virtual machine includes a virtual disk 632 for the OS and app1, app2, and app3. The replica virtual machine 630 also include virtual disks 634, 636, and 638 for, respectively, replicating data1, data2, and data3.

A failure domain, by way of example, indicates how a failure may impact the virtual machines and/or applications. More specifically, the replication engine 640 may evaluate the information 604, 406 and 608 to determine which of the production virtual machines belong to the same failure domain. For example, the replication engine 640 may determine, from the information 604, 606, and/or 608, that the virtual disk 612 and the virtual disk 618 (OS disks for virtual machines 610 and 616) are both allocated from the same datastore. As a result, a problem with the datastore X (e.g., device failure) will impact both the virtual machine 610 and the virtual machine 616. In this case, the replication engine 640 may decide to replicate the virtual machines 610 and 616 to different replica virtual machines. Similarly, virtual machines that share the same hypervisor are in the same failure domain and may be replicated to different replica virtual machines. In effect, virtual machines that are impacted by a specific event may be in the same failure domain, whether the event relate to a physical device, a hypervisor issue, an IP or network concern, or the like.

More specifically, if M production virtual machines are in the same failure domain (e.g., deployed on the same hypervisor system, share the same datastore), these virtual machines are likely to experience problems or disasters at the same time. For example, when a datastore has a hardware problem or a connectively issue or a hypervisor fails and is unavailable, all of the production virtual machines or applications are affected and may need to be failed over. If these production virtual machines have been replicated to the same replica virtual machine, then the performance of the failover or recovery operation is adversely affected by the need to recover or failover multiple applications at the same time on the same replica virtual machine.

By accounting for failure domains when replicating, the performance of the recovery or failover operations is improved. More specifically, if these virtual machines in the same failure domain are replicated to different replica virtual machines, the recovery or failover performance improves.

FIG. 7 illustrates an example of a method for replicating applications using a strategy such as a failure domain aware strategy. The method shown in FIG. 7 may begin by assessing 702 applications based on a failure domain or a failure domain aware strategy. This may include identifying the applications operating at a production site, identifying which applications are associated with which hypervisors, determining which datastores are associated with which applications or operating systems, identifying IP relationships shared or present among the applications or virtual machines.

More generally, the failure domain strategy identifies virtual machines, applications and/or application data that would be affected should a problem occur with regard to hardware, software, hypervisors, networking components or characteristics or the like. For example, virtual disks on the same datastore would likely all be impacted by an issue with the datastore. Applications or operating systems on the same hypervisor would all be impacted by an issue with the hypervisor.

The assessment 702 identifies subsets or groups of applications/virtual machines/application data based on these types of failure domains. Generally, this assessment ensures that the applications/virtual machines/application data in the same failure domain are not assigned or replicated to the same replica virtual machine. Similarly, applications/virtual machines/application data that are not part of the same failure domain may be allowed to share the same replica virtual machine.

This strategy may improve the performance of any failover or recovery operation. If applications from the same failure domain are on the same replica virtual machine, the recovery is likely slowed because multiple applications are being failed over or recovered on the same replica virtual machines. If the applications on a replica virtual machine are associated with different failure domains, then failover or recovery may not involve multiple applications on the same replica virtual machine.

Next, the replica virtual machines are configured 704 based on the strategy. Thus, each replica virtual machine may be prepared or reconfigured, if necessary, to replicate a subset of the production applications. Next, the production virtual machines (or application data) is replicated 708 based on the strategy from the production virtual machines to the replica virtual machines.

Replication Strategies—Related Application Strategy

By way of example, the applications of a production site may be related to or depend on other applications. Further, the applications of a production site may also be distributed. Because these applications are related or interdependent, it is often useful to failover all of the related applications, even when only one of the applications fails or has an issue.

FIG. 8 illustrates an example of replicating using a replication strategy that accounts for application relationships or interdependencies. FIG. 8 illustrates production virtual machines 810, 816, 822, 828, 834, and 840. These production virtual machines include, byway of example only, an OS/app virtual disk and a data virtual disk. The OS and app1, for example, are associated with the virtual disk 812 and the data of the application is stored on or associated with the virtual disk 814. The OS/app disks and data disks include, as illustrated in FIG. 8, virtual disks 818, 820 for the virtual machine 816, virtual disks 824 and 826 for the virtual machine 822, virtual disks 830 and 932 for the virtual machine 828, virtual disks 836 and 838 for the virtual machine 834, and virtual disks 842 and 844 for the virtual machine 840.

FIG. 8 further illustrates that applications app1, app3, and app 6 are related. For example, app1 may be a web layer, app3 may be a logic layer, and app6 may be a database layer of a multi-layer deployment. If there is a disaster that impacts only app6 (or the data of app6), it may be necessary to failover app6 to the replica site or to a replica virtual machine.

However, failing over only the virtual machine 840 (or the app6) may create a latency between the applications running on the production site and the application running on the replica site. This latency may be unacceptable for various reasons. As a result, it may be desirable to failover all of the related applications.

As illustrated in FIG. 8, an application interdependency or related application replication strategy ensures that related applications are replicated to different virtual machines. In this example, the virtual disk (or data1) is replicated to the virtual disk 854 of the virtual machine 850, the data3 is replicated to the virtual machine 860, and the data6 is replicated to the virtual disk 876 of virtual machine 870.

In this example, if any of the app1, app3, and app6 require failover, all of the related apps are failed over. This improves performance at least because the related applications are all operating at the failover or replica site. This allows the production site to become the replica site as well in one example. This allows the related applications to failback if necessary or when needed.

FIG. 9 illustrates an example of a method for replicating applications/virtual machines/application data using a replication strategy such as an interdependent application strategy.

FIG. 9 begins by assessing 902 applications operating at a production site based on a related application strategy (also referred to an application inter-dependence strategy). The applications are assessed by identifying related applications. For example, many larger applications operate in pieces or layers and each layer may correspond to an application. As previously state, an application may include a multi-layer deployment that includes various layers operating on virtual machines of a production site (e.g., a cloud, datacenter, or the like). These applications are grouped together and the replication engine may ensure that these applications are replicated to different virtual machines. When replicating related applications, the replica virtual machines may be the target of multiple applications. As long as none of the applications are related, operationally, this may be allowed using the related application strategy. A limit on the number of applications replicated to a particular replica virtual machine may be capped or limited.

Thus, as illustrated in FIG. 8, the data2 on the virtual disk 824 is replicated to the virtual disk 866 and the virtual disk 862 of the virtual machine 860 may be an OS disk and include a copy or binary of app3 and app4. However, the data3 and the data4 are not related or part of the same overall application.

Similarly, the data2 is replicated to the virtual disk 856 of the virtual machine 850 and the virtual disk 852 may include the OS as well as binaries of app1 and app2. Also, the data5 may be replicated to the virtual disk 874 and the virtual disk 872 of the virtual machine 870 may be an OS disk and store binaries of app5 and app6.

In some examples of the replication strategies, the applications on the OS disks may be operational. This shortens the RTO and allows the data disks to simply be mounted during failover or disaster recovery or for other event.

If the related apps are all replicated to the same virtual machine, the performance of the overall application may suffer from a performance perspective due to low resources. Further, failing all of the related applications to the same replica virtual machine may also impact the performance of the failover operation because a single virtual machine is performing failover for multiple related applications at the same time.

Dynamic Strategy

Embodiments of the invention further relate to strategies including replication strategies that relate to fixed data protection topologies and/or changing data protection topologies. The replication strategies discussed herein can be static and/or dynamic. In addition, embodiments of the invention also allow these strategies to adapt to changing environments. More specifically, embodiments of the invention include or relate to data protection systems that adapt to changes in the computing environment or in the data protection environment or to changes in the machines or systems being protected. The data protection system, by way of example, is configured to dynamically and/or automatically change or adapt the replication performed by the data protection system. In the context of replicating virtual machines, changing or adapting to the topology of the production site/production virtual machines includes making changes to the relationships between the production virtual machines and the replica virtual machines. By way of example, a change in topology refers to changes the manner in which applications are replicated. Changes in the topology may include, by way of example and not limitation, the addition or removal of an application, the migration of an application to a different server, changes in storage, hypervisors, domains, user input, user designated priorities, or the like or combination thereof.

Dynamic Strategy—Adapting to Changing Environment

In one example, dynamically and/or automatically adapting to a changing environment using, for example, a QoS Strategy, a failure domain aware strategy and/or a related application strategy, includes changing the manner in which the applications are distributed or replicated to the replica virtual machines. This may include reallocating virtual machines, adding new replica virtual machines, migrating virtual machines to different servers or hosts, changing which applications are replicated to which replica virtual machines, or the like or combination thereof.

For example, an entity or user may escalate an application A to a higher priority from a lower priority (higher importance from lower importance). In one example and with reference to FIG. 4, the replication engine 404 may be aware of changes in priority. For example, a change in priority may be reflected in the rules 406. The change in priority can be based on user input, a change in the amount of resources required, the importance of a particular task, or the like. The replication engine 404 may monitor the rules for changes or a notification may be generated when the rules 406 have changed.

For example and with reference to FIG. 4, if app2 is raised in importance to have an importance or priority higher than app1, the data protection system may begin replicating app2 to the replica disk 416 and replicate app1 to the replica disks 418. Alternatively, a new replica virtual disk may be started and the app2 may be replicated to the new replica virtual disk while the app1 is still replicated to the replica disk 416.

This allows the data protection system 402 to dynamically change the topology of the replica virtual disks or replica virtual machines. In this example, the change in the importance or priority of an application was not necessarily reflected in a change in the topology of the production virtual disks 420 or the replica virtual disks 422. However, the data protection system 402 changed the topology, arrangement, or distribution of the replica virtual disks 422 in response to the change in the priority, which was reflected by way of example only as a change (e.g., deleted rule, modified rule, new rule) in the rules 406.

When the strategy includes a failure domain aware strategy and with reference to FIG. 6, the replication engine 640 (part of a data protection system) may monitor or be informed of changes in the deployment of production and or replica virtual machines.

For example, load balancing requirements may result in a production virtual machine being migrated from one physical server to another physical server. This type of change in the topology of the production virtual machines may change the assessment performed with respect to failure domains. Migrating a virtual machine from one physical server to another physical server may change, for example, the hypervisor associated with the migrated virtual machine. As previously described, the failure domain aware strategy accounts for the hypervisors on which the virtual machines operate. Consequently, the assessment that is used to replicate virtual machines may be impacted by the migration of the virtual machine. The replication engine 640 may, in this example, periodically reassess the replication deployment and configuration or reassess in response to a detected change or in response to a notification regarding the change. Alternatively, the replication engine 640 may be configured to detect and respond dynamically and automatically to changes that impact the failure domain assessment.

The replication engine of the data protection system may similarly be configured to adapt to changes when the replication strategy focuses on related application. Changes in the topology of the production virtual machines may require a change in the replication of the virtual machines. The data protection system can monitor for these changes or receive input from a user related to the application topology. In response, the data protection system can move the replicated applications and/or their virtual disks between replica virtual machines, to new virtual machines, or the like as needed.

In another example, the data protection system may monitor the replica virtual machines. When one or more of the replica virtual machines become loaded with failed over applications, embodiments of the invention may scale out and dynamically add additional virtual machines. The applications can be redistributed using the added replica virtual machines. A similar assessment as previously discussed may be performed to determine how the applications are replicated in this example.

Dynamic Strategy—Failure Prediction

Including failure prediction to manage replication allows the data protection system to operate with fewer replica machines when no failure is anticipated and to run more replica virtual machines when failure is predicted. Embodiments of the invention may incorporate artificial intelligence or machine learning to predict failures or other circumstances that may benefit from changing the manner in which applications are replicated. Predicting failures gives the data protection system advance warning of a potential problem and the opportunity to respond to the potential issue. In some examples, the problem indicated by machine learning may be avoided by taking action based on machine learning or other statistic based models. If adding more virtual machines and replicating some of the applications to the added virtual machines results in a prediction that the replication will not fail, this type of action can be taken. In one embodiment, the model may not only predict the failure but may also predict a potential solution to the failure or to prevent the anticipated failure. The results of the machine learning can be used by the data protection engine to manager the deployment of the virtual machines (e.g., add, remove), move applications and/or their data to different virtual machines, or the like or combination thereof.

In one example, the data protection system (or a separate prediction engine that interfaces with the data protection system) may be configured to collect system runtime statistics as training features for the model. The system runtime statistics may include, but are not limited to, disk IO latency and change rate, network IO latency and change rate, CPU/memory utilization, IO error numbers and change rate, and log file size increase rate. This data and any time series generated from this data can be used to train models such as fail-stop models or fail-slow models before the disaster or other issue occurs.

FIG. 10 illustrates an example of a data protection system that includes or that is configured to implement, by way of example only and not limitation, a failure prediction strategy or any of the other strategies discussed herein or combination thereof.

FIG. 10 illustrates an example of a data protection system 1002 (e.g., such as a replication appliance whether virtual or physical). The data protection system 1002 may include a replication appliance at both the production site and/or the replica site. In this example, the data protection system 1002 is associated with or includes a replication engine 1004 that is configured to replicate or assist in the replication of a production site (e.g., virtual machines, applications, application data) to a replica site.

In this example, the replication engine 1004 may include a prediction engine 1006 that is configured to predict failure or problems at the replica site or with respect to the virtual machines and/or applications at the replica site. However, the replication engine 1004 may also include a model that accounts for characteristics at the production site, such as an increased workload, increased resource consumption, workload schedules, or the like.

The replication engine 1004 (or the prediction engine 1006) may collect or receive statistics or characteristics (generally referred to herein as statistics herein) from the replica site and/or the production site that may include operations statistics. The prediction engine 1006 may use the statistics 1012 and/or time series 1014, which may be generated from the statistics that are sampled or collected over time. This statistics 1012 and/or time series 1014 may be used to train a model to predict failure of the replica site, the production site, or of the replication occurring therebetween.

The prediction engine 1006 may also support triggers 1008. The triggers 1008 may include information about the weather or other threats (e.g., a hurricane notification) that can be used to adjust the topology of the replication virtual machines or the specifics of the replication strategy (which applications are replicated to which virtual machines).

In one example, the model of the prediction engine 1006 may output a value based on the input (e.g., the current statistics or current time series or triggers). If the value output by the prediction engine 1006 is above threshold value, which indicates a sufficiently high risk of threat, the replication engine 1004 may reconfigure or adjust the topology of the replica virtual machines 1010. This allows the replication engine 1004 to spread applications impacted by the potential threat on more replica virtual machines. If the value subsequently lowers below the threshold value, the replication engine 1006 may consolidate applications to fewer virtual machines.

In another example, the prediction engine 1006 may identify which virtual machine is expected to fail first and may identify potential remedies.

Because the model is based on machine learning, the model can identify specific characteristics (e.g., IO latency) that, when slow, lead to a problem with specific components or virtual machines or with the replication system as a whole. Further, the model of the prediction engine 1006 can also identify relationships, including non-linear relationships among the statistics of the replica virtual machines 1010 that may lead to a problem. Examples of failure prediction models are implemented in, by way of example, Dell EMC CloudIQ, Dell EMC eCDA, VMware Logs Insight and more.

The model or machine learning algorithm can account for the statistics discussed herein, and model time series using, by way of example, ARIMA and Holt-Winters algorithms. By way of examples, these algorithms can receive input such as seasonality (e.g., expected load times) or they can be used to find the best seasonality. Seasonality can be hourly, daily, weekly, for instance. The best model may also find the most appropriate seasonality. This allows the topology to be changed based on the seasonality or the anticipated seasonality.

When implementing strategies to improve or reduce RTO dynamically, by way of example only, embodiments of the invention (e.g., the replication engine or, more generally, the data protection system) is configured to move, add, remove, and/or rearrange applications on the replica virtual machines (and/or the production virtual machines) based on the new or updated assessment that is performed in accordance with the current replication strategy.

FIG. 11 illustrates an example of a replication strategy for dynamically and automatically changing the topology of replica virtual machines or of a replica site based on machine learning. FIG. 11 is also used to illustrate a method for changing or adapting the topology of the replica virtual machines.

FIG. 11 illustrates production virtual machines 1160 and illustrates replica virtual machines 1162 before a change in the topology of the replica site and replica virtual machines 1164 after the topology change. The production virtual machines 1160 include virtual machines 1102, 1108, 1114, and 1120. The virtual machines 1102, 1108, 1114, and 1120 are associated with OS/app virtual disks and data disks. OS disk 1104 and data disk 1106 are associated with the virtual machine 1102, OS disk 1110 and data disk 1112 are running on the virtual machine 1108, OS disk 1116 and data disk 1118 are running on the virtual machine 1114, and the OS disk 1122 and the data disk 1124 are running on the virtual machine 1120.

Before the change in topology, the replica virtual machine 1126 includes an OS disk 1128 that also includes app1 and app2 and the data disk 1130 for data1 (data of app1) and the data disk 1132 for data2 (the data of app2). Similarly, the replica virtual machine 1134 includes OS disk 1136 with app3 and app4 and the data disk 1138 for data3 (data of app3) and data disk 1139 for data4 (data of app4).

In this example, virtual machines 1126 and 1140 are the same replica virtual disks at different points in time (before/after the change in topology). Virtual machines 1134 and replica virtual machine 1146 are also the same replica virtual disks at the corresponding points in time. The virtual disks have a similar correspondence.

FIG. 11 illustrates that the replication engine has decided to move the app1 from the virtual machine 1126/1140 to the virtual machine 1134/1146 based on results of a model. In other words, the model may predict a potential failure for the system and/or for one or more of the virtual machine.

Alternatively, the change in the topology may be in response to a detected change with respect to any of the strategies discussed herein. For example, a change in the quality of service may cause the data protection engine to have the app2 and its data on a dedicated virtual machine. Similarly, changes in the failure domain, changes in the related applications, exceeding a threshold predictive value, or the like may result in a topology change.

In order to move app1 from the virtual machine 1140 to the virtual machine 1146, embodiments of the invention may use solutions such as Chef or Puppet. Further, the IP addresses and credentials may be used in order to configure the installation of app1 on the virtual machine 1146. After the app1 is successfully installed on the disk 1148, the app1 may be uninstalled from the virtual machine 1140. Uninstalling the app1 may be optional, but aids in clearing disk space. After successfully installing the app1 on the disk 1148, the data protection system may move the data disk 1130 from the virtual machine 1140 to the virtual machine 1146. This should not impact the OS disk 1142 at least because the data disks on the replica virtual machines are not in use as replicas.

FIG. 11 illustrates the status or arrangement of the replica virtual machines 1162 before the change in topology and the status or arrangement the replica virtual machines 1164 after the change in topology. During the change, replication from the production site to the replica site may continue. Queues and caches and journals may be used to facilitate this process. Alternatively, the data may continue to be replicated to the virtual disks even if unattached.

FIG. 11 illustrates an example where the application is installed on (or the binary is stored on) the OS disk of the virtual machine. However, the applications and their data may be replicated such that the applications are portable. A portable app indicates, by way of example only, that the application is not installed or stored on the OS disk, but may be stored on the same disk as the data that is being replicated. This allows the application and the data together.

FIG. 12 illustrates an example of moving a portable application in accordance with a replication strategy. FIG. 12 illustrates a replica virtual machines 1230 before a change in topology and replica virtual machines 1232 illustrates the replica virtual machines after the change in topology. In this example, the replica virtual machine 1230 includes an OS disk 1204 that also stores app2. The replica virtual machine 1202 also includes a data disk 1208 for app2 and a portable disk 1206 that includes both app1 and data1. The portable disk can be moved to the virtual disk 1210.

The virtual machine 1210, prior to the change, included the OS disk 1212, which also includes app3 and app4. The virtual machine 120 also included data disks 1214 for data3 and 1216 for data4. After the change, the portable disk 1206 was added. After the change in topology, the disk 1206 is no longer associated with the virtual machine 1202 as illustrated in FIG. 12. In one example, the app1 and the data1 may be on different disks and still be portable. A portable application, by way of example only, can be run from a separate disk without being pre-installed on the OS disk. Thus, the application and the data can be stored on different disks.

In one example, a data protection may be replicating applications. For example, four applications may replicate to the same replica virtual machine. In one example, two of these applications may fail over to the replica virtual machine. In this example, if another application failed over, the resources of the replica virtual machine may not be able to handle the resource demand and, as a result, performance will suffer.

This type of situation may be detected by the machine learning model. However, the replication strategy may scale out by adding a new virtual machine. The new replica virtual machine may be for the applications that have not failed over. As previously described, migrating a replica application is distinct and potentially easier than migrating a running application. This keeps the RTO very low and provides high performance.

Scaling out the replica virtual machine may be achieved by cloning the existing replica virtual machine. More specifically, only the OS disk is cloned—not the data disks in one example. Next, the applications that have not failed over are moved to the new virtual machine. In one example, the cloning process may use snapshots.

In another example, the scaling out process may be performed using a template virtual machine, which can be spawned on demand. When using a template virtual machine, the OS disk that contains the applications does not need to be cloned and there is no need to uninstall any applications in the new virtual disk. The template virtual machine may be created as part of an original configuration. The template virtual machine may be used to create a replica virtual machine. Next, a desired OS is installed.

After installing the OS, the procedure can follow the processes previously described. Non portable applications, for example, can be installed on the replica virtual machine and replication can be performed. If the replica virtual machine becomes heavy (e.g., too many failed over applications, too many applications replicating to the same virtual machine), a second replica machine may be created from the template virtual machine. For non-portable applications, the applications that have not yet failed over are installed on the second replica machine. The disks from the initial replica virtual machine that belong to applications that have not failed over are detached from the initial replica virtual machine and then attached to the second replica virtual machine. The non portable applications are uninstalled from the initial virtual machine. Finally, replication continues for the applications moved to the second replica virtual machine.

Embodiments of the invention thus relate to a cost-optimized true zero RTO solution based on dynamic replication strategies. Embodiments of the invention relate to dynamic replica virtual machine deployment optimization that is adaptive to environment changes. Embodiments of the invention can adaptively change the replication topology using static and/or dynamic strategies. Embodiments of the invention can adapt the replication strategy using machine learning and artificial intelligence. Heavily loaded replica virtual machines can be scaled out to multiple replica virtual machines using, for example, cloning or virtual machine templates. Embodiments of the invention further allows multiple applications to fail over without the risk of running out of resources (e.g., by creating new replica virtual machines). IN addition, embodiments of the invention can also scale down the number of replica virtual machines based on the strategies discussed herein.

FIG. 13 illustrates an example of a method for replicating applications. The method 1300 may begin by repeatedly assessing 1302, by a data protection system, the virtual machines/applications protected by the data protection system in accordance with a replication strategy. The virtual machines and/or applications may be assessed periodically for example. The applications are replicated 1304 in accordance with the replication strategy.

Assessing 1302 may also include one or more other elements in different combinations. For example, the assessment may be based on a replication strategy that uses a machine model. The machine model may use inputs that include characteristics of the virtual machines, applications, and/or the like. The inputs may be from the production virtual machines/applications and/or the replica virtual machines/applications. The machine model may output a value and when the value exceeds a threshold value, the topology of the replica virtual machines is changed.

The characteristics can be sampled over time to generate sample data. The sample data may be used to train the machine model. The machine model can be updated or retrained using more current inputs.

The output of the machine model may also reflect or predict a slowing or a failure of the replication at various locations including at the replica site. The machine model may also be able to identify potential solutions in addition to simply predicting a slow down or failure. The potential solutions may be reflected in the changed made to the topology of the replica virtual machines at 1306.

Assessing the applications may also include adapting to changes in the environment and adapt replication strategies that may be used in a static manner. For example, changes in the importance of an application, changes in failure domains, or changes in related applications are changes that may be used to change 1306 the topology of the replica virtual machines as previously described. These changes can be detected separately from the machine model or the machine model may be adapted to account for these changes and use additional inputs such as machine migration or other factors or characteristics used to identify related applications, quality of service, or failure domains as inputs. Assessing the applications may also include monitoring or receiving triggers related to incoming danger, such as natural disasters and the like that may impact the data protection system and the protected systems.

Changing 1306 the topology may include one or more of moving an application, whether using a tool or by moving a portable application. Changing 1306 the topology may also include scaling the replica virtual machines by cloning (e.g., cloning only the operating disk and then moving the applications) or using a virtual machine template and then moving the applications.

Embodiments of the invention, such as the examples disclosed herein, may be beneficial in a variety of respects. For example, and as will be apparent from the present disclosure, one or more embodiments of the invention may provide one or more advantageous and unexpected effects, in any combination, some examples of which are set forth below. It should be noted that such effects are neither intended, nor should be construed, to limit the scope of the claimed invention in any way. It should further be noted that nothing herein should be construed as constituting an essential or indispensable element of any invention or embodiment. Rather, various aspects of the disclosed embodiments may be combined in a variety of ways so as to define yet further embodiments. Such further embodiments are considered as being within the scope of this disclosure. As well, none of the embodiments embraced within the scope of this disclosure should be construed as resolving, or being limited to the resolution of, any particular problem(s). Nor should any such embodiments be construed to implement, or be limited to implementation of, any particular technical effect(s) or solution(s). Finally, it is not required that any embodiment implement any of the advantageous and unexpected effects disclosed herein.

The following is a discussion of aspects of example operating environments for various embodiments of the invention. This discussion is not intended to limit the scope of the invention, or the applicability of the embodiments, in any way.

In general, embodiments of the invention may be implemented in connection with systems, software, and components, that individually and/or collectively implement, and/or cause the implementation of, data protection operations. The scope of the invention embraces any operating environment in which the disclosed concepts may be useful.

At least some embodiments of the invention provide for the implementation of the disclosed functionality in existing data protection platforms, examples of which include RecoverPoint for VMs. In general however, the scope of the invention is not limited to any particular data backup platform or data storage environment.

New and/or modified data collected and/or generated in connection with some embodiments, may be stored in a data protection environment that may take the form of a public or private cloud storage environment, an on-premises storage environment, and hybrid storage environments that include public and private elements. Any of these example storage environments, may be partly, or completely, virtualized. The storage environment may comprise, or consist of, a datacenter which is operable to service read, write, delete, backup, restore, and/or cloning, operations initiated by one or more clients or other elements of the operating environment. Where a backup comprises groups of data with different respective characteristics, that data may be allocated, and stored, to different respective targets in the storage environment, where the targets each correspond to a data group having one or more particular characteristics.

Example public cloud storage environments in connection with which embodiments of the invention may be employed include, but are not limited to, Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, and Google Cloud. More generally however, the scope of the invention is not limited to employment of any particular type or implementation of cloud storage.

In addition to the storage environment, the operating environment may also include one or more clients that are capable of collecting, modifying, and creating, data. As such, a particular client may employ, or otherwise be associated with, one or more instances of each of one or more applications that perform such operations with respect to data.

Devices in the operating environment may take the form of software, physical machines, or virtual machines (VM), or any combination of these, though no particular device implementation or configuration is required for any embodiment. Similarly, data protection system components such as databases, storage servers, storage volumes (LUNs), storage disks, replication services, backup servers, restore servers, backup clients, and restore clients, for example, may likewise take the form of software, physical machines or virtual machines (VM), though no particular component implementation is required for any embodiment. Where VMs are employed, a hypervisor or other virtual machine monitor (VMM) may be employed to create and control the VMs. The term VM embraces, but is not limited to, any virtualization, emulation, or other representation, of one or more computing system elements, such as computing system hardware. A VM may be based on one or more computer architectures, and provides the functionality of a physical computer. A VM implementation may comprise, or at least involve the use of, hardware and/or software. An image of a VM may take various forms, such as a .VMDK file for example.

As used herein, the term ‘data’ is intended to be broad in scope. Thus, that term embraces, by way of example and not limitation, data segments such as may be produced by data stream segmentation processes, data chunks, data blocks, atomic data, emails, objects of any type, files of any type including media files, word processing files, spreadsheet files, and database files, as well as contacts, directories, sub-directories, volumes, and any group of one or more of the foregoing.

Example embodiments of the invention are applicable to any system capable of storing and handling various types of objects, in analog, digital, or other form. Although terms such as document, file, segment, block, or object may be used by way of example, the principles of the disclosure are not limited to any particular form of representing and storing data or other information. Rather, such principles are equally applicable to any object capable of representing information.

As used herein, the term ‘backup’ is intended to be broad in scope. As such, example backups in connection with which embodiments of the invention may be employed include, but are not limited to, full backups, partial backups, clones, snapshots, and incremental or differential backups.

Following are some further example embodiments of the invention. These are presented only by way of example and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention in anyway.

Embodiment 1

A method for replicating data from a production site to a replica site, the method comprising repeatedly assessing, by a data protection system, applications protected by the data protection system based on a replication strategy using a machine model configured to generate a prediction regarding failure of the applications, wherein the replication strategy is configured to predict the failure based on inputs that include characteristics of the virtual machines, replicating the applications from production virtual machines at the production site to the replica virtual machines according to the replication strategy, and changing a topology of the replica virtual machines based on the prediction of the machine model.

Embodiment 2

A method according to embodiment 1, further comprising performing sampling to collect sample data corresponding to the characteristics of the virtual machines.

Embodiment 3

A method according to embodiment 1 and/or 2, wherein the characteristics of the virtual machines include the one or more of disk IO latency, disk change rate, network IO latency, network change rate, processor utilization, memory utilization, IO error number, and/or IO error rate, wherein the machine model generates a value, wherein the topology is changed when the value exceeds a threshold value.

Embodiment 4

A method according to embodiment 1, 2 and/or 3, wherein the sample data includes data points and time series data.

Embodiment 5

A method according to embodiment 1, 2, 3, and/or 4, further comprising training the machine model with the sample data.

Embodiment 6

A method according to embodiment 1, 2, 3, 4, and/or 5, wherein the inputs further includes triggers regarding an incoming danger.

Embodiment 7

A method according to embodiment 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and/or 6, further comprising monitoring for changes in the applications at the production site and adapting to the changes in the production site, the changes including quality of service changes, failure domain changes, and/or related application changes.

Embodiment 8

A method according to embodiment 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and/or 7, further comprising changing the topology by moving applications, moving portable applications, and/or scaling the replica virtual machines.

Embodiment 9

A method according to embodiment 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and/or 8, further comprising scaling the replica virtual machines by cloning a replica virtual machine, wherein only an operating disk is cloned to generate a new replica virtual machine and wherein applications are then moved to the new replica virtual machine.

Embodiment 10

A method according to embodiment 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and/or 9, further comprising creating a replica virtual machine template, wherein scaling the replica virtual machines includes instantiating a new replica virtual machine based on the replica virtual machine template.

Embodiment 11

A method for performing any of the operations, methods, or processes, or any portion of any of these, disclosed herein in any of the embodiments disclosed herein in the specification and/or in the Figures.

Embodiment 12

A non-transitory storage medium having stored therein instructions that are executable by one or more hardware processors to perform the operations of any one or more of or portions of embodiments 1-11.

The embodiments disclosed herein may include the use of a special purpose or general-purpose computer including various computer hardware or software modules, as discussed in greater detail below. A computer may include a processor and computer storage media carrying instructions that, when executed by the processor and/or caused to be executed by the processor, perform any one or more of the methods disclosed herein, or any part(s) of any method disclosed.

As indicated above, embodiments within the scope of the present invention also include computer storage media, which are physical media for carrying or having computer-executable instructions or data structures stored thereon. Such computer storage media may be any available physical media that may be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer.

By way of example, and not limitation, such computer storage media may comprise hardware storage such as solid state disk/device (SSD), RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM, flash memory, phase-change memory (“PCM”), or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other hardware storage devices which may be used to store program code in the form of computer-executable instructions or data structures, which may be accessed and executed by a general-purpose or special-purpose computer system to implement the disclosed functionality of the invention. Combinations of the above should also be included within the scope of computer storage media. Such media are also examples of non-transitory storage media, and non-transitory storage media also embraces cloud-based storage systems and structures, although the scope of the invention is not limited to these examples of non-transitory storage media.

Computer-executable instructions comprise, for example, instructions and data which, when executed, cause a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing device to perform a certain function or group of functions. As such, some embodiments of the invention may be downloadable to one or more systems or devices, for example, from a website, mesh topology, or other source. As well, the scope of the invention embraces any hardware system or device that comprises an instance of an application that comprises the disclosed executable instructions.

Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts disclosed herein are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.

As used herein, the term ‘module’ or ‘component’ may refer to software objects or routines that execute on the computing system. The different components, modules, engines, and services described herein may be implemented as objects or processes that execute on the computing system, for example, as separate threads. While the system and methods described herein may be implemented in software, implementations in hardware or a combination of software and hardware are also possible and contemplated. In the present disclosure, a ‘computing entity’ may be any computing system as previously defined herein, or any module or combination of modules running on a computing system.

In at least some instances, a hardware processor is provided that is operable to carry out executable instructions for performing a method or process, such as the methods and processes disclosed herein. The hardware processor may or may not comprise an element of other hardware, such as the computing devices and systems disclosed herein.

In terms of computing environments, embodiments of the invention may be performed in client-server environments, whether network or local environments, or in any other suitable environment. Suitable operating environments for at least some embodiments of the invention include cloud computing environments where one or more of a client, server, or other machine may reside and operate in a cloud environment.

Any one or more of the entities disclosed, or implied, by the Figures and/or elsewhere herein, may take the form of, or include, or be implemented on, or hosted by, a physical computing device. As well, where any of the aforementioned elements comprise or consist of a virtual machine (VM), that VM may constitute a virtualization of any combination of the physical components disclosed in herein.

An example of physical computing device may include a memory which may include one, some, or all, of random access memory (RAM), non-volatile random access memory (NVRAM), read-only memory (ROM), and persistent memory, one or more hardware processors, non-transitory storage media, UI device, and data storage. One or more of the memory components of the physical computing device may take the form of solid state device (SSD) storage. As well, one or more applications may be provided that comprise instructions executable by one or more hardware processors to perform any of the operations, or portions thereof, disclosed herein.

Such executable instructions may take various forms including, for example, instructions executable to perform any method or portion thereof disclosed herein, and/or executable by/at any of a storage site, whether on-premises at an enterprise, or a cloud storage site, client, datacenter, or backup server, to perform any of the functions disclosed herein. As well, such instructions may be executable to perform any of the other operations and methods, and any portions thereof, disclosed herein.

The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for replicating data from a production site to a replica site, the method comprising: repeatedly assessing, by a data protection system, applications protected by the data protection system based on a replication strategy using a machine model configured to generate a prediction regarding failure of the applications, wherein the replication strategy is configured to predict the failure based on inputs that include characteristics of the virtual machines; replicating the applications from production virtual machines at the production site to the replica virtual machines according to the replication strategy; and changing a topology of the replica virtual machines based on the prediction of the machine model.
 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising performing sampling to collect sample data corresponding to the characteristics of the virtual machines.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the characteristics of the virtual machines include the one or more of disk IO latency, disk change rate, network IO latency, network change rate, processor utilization, memory utilization, IO error number, and/or IO error rate, wherein the machine model generates a value, wherein the topology is changed when the value exceeds a threshold value.
 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the sample data includes data points and time series data.
 5. The method of claim 3, further comprising training the machine model with the sample data.
 6. The method of claim 3, wherein the inputs further includes triggers regarding an incoming danger.
 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising monitoring for changes in the applications at the production site and adapting to the changes in the production site, the changes including quality of service changes, failure domain changes, and/or related application changes.
 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising changing the topology by moving applications, moving portable applications, and/or scaling the replica virtual machines.
 9. The method of claim 8, further comprising scaling the replica virtual machines by cloning a replica virtual machine, wherein only an operating disk is cloned to generate a new replica virtual machine and wherein applications are then moved to the new replica virtual machine.
 10. The method of claim 8, further comprising creating a replica virtual machine template, wherein scaling the replica virtual machines includes instantiating a new replica virtual machine based on the replica virtual machine template.
 11. A non-transitory storage medium having stored therein instructions that are executable by one or more hardware processors to perform operations for replicating a production site to a replica site, the method comprising: repeatedly assessing, by a data protection system, applications protected by the data protection system based on a replication strategy using a machine model configured to generate a prediction regarding failure of the applications, wherein the replication strategy is configured to predict the failure based on inputs that include characteristics of the virtual machines; replicating the applications from production virtual machines at the production site to the replica virtual machines according to the replication strategy; and changing a topology of the replica virtual machines based on the prediction of the machine model.
 12. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 11, the operations further comprising performing sampling to collect sample data corresponding to the characteristics of the virtual machines.
 13. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 12, wherein the characteristics of the virtual machines include the one or more of disk IO latency, disk change rate, network IO latency, network change rate, processor utilization, memory utilization, IO error number, and/or IO error rate, wherein the machine model generates a value, wherein the topology is changed when the value exceeds a threshold value.
 14. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 13, wherein the sample data includes data points and time series data.
 15. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 13, the operations further comprising training the machine model with the sample data.
 16. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 13, wherein the inputs further includes triggers regarding an incoming danger.
 17. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 11, the operations further comprising monitoring for changes in the applications at the production site and adapting to the changes in the production site, the changes including quality of service changes, failure domain changes, and/or related application changes.
 18. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 11, the operations further comprising changing the topology by moving applications, moving portable applications, and/or scaling the replica virtual machines.
 19. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 18, the operations further comprising scaling the replica virtual machines by cloning a replica virtual machine, wherein only an operating disk is cloned to generate a new replica virtual machine and wherein applications are then moved to the new replica virtual machine.
 20. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 18, the operations further comprising creating a replica virtual machine template, wherein scaling the replica virtual machines includes instantiating a new replica virtual machine based on the replica virtual machine template. 